Why was Hanfu banned

Why was Hanfu banned in the Qing Dynasty?

Hanfu, also known as traditional Chinese clothing, was widely worn throughout China for thousands of years prior to the Qing Dynasty (1644-1912). However, during the Qing Dynasty, wearing Hanfu was banned, and those who violated this law were subject to punishment.

There are several reasons why Hanfu was banned during this time. Firstly, the Manchu rulers of the Qing Dynasty saw themselves as outsiders to China and sought to distance themselves from the Han Chinese population. They believed that by promoting their own style of dress, they could reinforce their identity as a separate ruling class. This led to the promotion of the Manchu-style clothing known as "qipao" and the suppression of Hanfu.

Another reason for the ban on Hanfu was the association of this style of dress with the Ming Dynasty (1368-1644), which had been overthrown by the Qing. The Qing Dynasty sought to erase any reminders of the previous ruling dynasty and its culture, including the clothing styles that were popular during that time.

Furthermore, the Qing government saw Hanfu as a symbol of rebellion and resistance, particularly among members of secret societies and other groups who opposed Qing rule. By banning Hanfu, the Qing hoped to suppress these movements and maintain control over the population.

During the Qing Dynasty, Hanfu was prohibited by Manchu rulers who sought to assert their authority over a broader ethnic group. This ban persisted into Mao Zedong's era, as traditional Chinese clothing was viewed as a symbol of the imperial past and thus contrary to Communist values. However, as China shifted its focus towards economic development in the 1980s, Hanfu gradually gained popularity in mainstream culture.

In conclusion, the ban on Hanfu during the Qing Dynasty was motivated by political, cultural, and social factors. While this clothing style has experienced a revival in recent years, it remains an important example of how dress can be used both to express cultural identity and to exert political control.

Back to blog